Cost would be the biggest disadvantage to specifying a built up hoist into an overhead crane system. The cost factors into the equation in many ways:
Lower duty cycle cranes can utilize more standardized and economical hoists—resulting in significant cost savings. However, it can be argued that the initial investment into upgraded built up hoist components and technologies will offset the costs of future maintenance and repairs. By taking the time to engineer the hoist to perform exactly as intended, and to withstand the rigors of the lift it will be performing, the hoist will experience a longer operating life and will be more durable and more reliable for the end-user.
Versatility would be another disadvantage to a built up hoist. These hoists are designed to do one thing and do that one thing extremely well. Lower duty hoist systems have a little more flexibility in terms of how they can be used. They can pick various types of materials and vary the frequency of lifts within their capacity and duty cycle requirements.
Training and inspection would be another factor for the end-user. Even to a seasoned crane operator, there will be an adjustment period to get used to the way the crane handles and performs. If the crane operators were used to operating an older package hoist system, the controls and performance of a new built up hoist can feel very different. The components of the hoist are also more complex and may require more training or a more seasoned inspector to perform frequent and periodic crane inspections.
Most crane manufacturers or service companies will offer training for the operators and in-house maintenance personnel once the crane system has been installed—these trainings can be fully customized based on the preferences of the business owner, operators, and maintenance personnel.
En contacto con nuestros especialistas de la grúa
Envíenos un mensaje y nos pondremos en contacto con usted tan pronto como sea posible.